Discussion:
OT - Bud Light
(too old to reply)
Conscience
2009-07-31 15:34:55 UTC
Permalink
Tell me you're not going to claim this is a new revelation to you?  
That some people see him as a racist?  Of course not.
"Some" are far, far more than you'd want to admit or believe.
And you know this how?
I'll let you guess that one.  If I point it out to you, you'll now
claim the public has no right to do so.
No I won't. Tell me.
Why bother? I've already taught you about police procedures and
training. You know better.
Ironic, isn't it?
Rule: you aren't allowed to classify something that hasn't happened
as "ironic". Maybe you meant "would be ironic if".
Nope. Under your parameters, it stands.
matrixxxx09
2009-07-31 15:43:50 UTC
Permalink
No I won't.  Tell me.
Why bother?  I've already taught you about police procedures and
training.  You know better.
I knew you were full of it. You possess no evidence that "the public"
perceives Obama as a racist. See, you chose to weasel out with this
"Well if you don't know *I'm* not going to tell you." game, which
everyone deciphered the true meaning of when they were toddlers,
rather than admit you were talking out of your ass. The only
question left is WHY you chose to go that way.
Ironic, isn't it?
Rule:  you aren't allowed to classify something that hasn't happened
as "ironic".  Maybe you meant "would be ironic if".
Nope.  Under your parameters, it stands.
Don't blame 'my parameters' for YOUR treatment of a chain events that
MAY happen in the FUTURE as something that DID HAPPEN in the PAST.

You own that. What you described never happened, so it's incorrect
for you to refer to it as "ironic". Take personal responsiblity for
it.
Conscience
2009-07-31 16:54:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by matrixxxx09
No I won't.  Tell me.
Why bother?  I've already taught you about police procedures and
training.  You know better.
I knew you were full of it. You possess no evidence that "the public"
perceives Obama as a racist. See, you chose to weasel out with this
"Well if you don't know *I'm* not going to tell you." game, which
everyone deciphered the true meaning of when they were toddlers,
rather than admit you were talking out of your ass. The only
question left is WHY you chose to go that way.
Pretty funny. I've hammered your head with a brick regarding police
training and procedures, and now miraculously you're going to listen to
another viewpoint on another subject without repentance.

Why in the world would I want to continue discourse with someone who
wishes to remain in their current level of knowledge?
Post by matrixxxx09
Ironic, isn't it?
Rule:  you aren't allowed to classify something that hasn't happened
as "ironic".  Maybe you meant "would be ironic if".
Nope.  Under your parameters, it stands.
Don't blame 'my parameters' for YOUR treatment of a chain events that
MAY happen in the FUTURE as something that DID HAPPEN in the PAST.
You own that. What you described never happened, so it's incorrect
for you to refer to it as "ironic". Take personal responsiblity for
it.
Got it. Have a day.

Loading...