Post by Mike HunterOne advantage to AWD over FWD is the torque is biased to the rear in most
AWD versions, (although some are 50/50) thus reducing the dangerous
tendency to loose steering control upon deceleration that is common with
FWD.
Actually, no, where torque bias exists, its generally to the front wheels. I
don't know of any NORMALLY FWD car that has an AWD variant that biases
torque to the rear. There's lots of RWD vehicles with AWD/4WD variants that
runs to the front (most SUVs).
Examples are
- Honda CRV which is about 65/35 front rear (look at the diff ratios and the
rear diff hydro lock system)
- Chrysler "AWD" minivans are about 75/25 when its actually working, and
maybe 10% rear when its not, due to the rear drive being derived from the RH
front axle. Its an expensive system that only works because there's an
ABS/Traction system that gives limited AWD. Lose the ABS system and the
"AWD" becomes just excess weight.
- Early Mitsibishi Lancer GSR / EVO 1, EVO 2 with the W5M31 transmission
with about 65/35 bias to the front. The rear diff ratio was numerically
lower on the rear. Mitsu found this was unsuitable (and fragile) and
switched to the W5M33 series, see below.
Examples of 50/50 in normal operation are
- Mitsubishi Eclipse/Expo/Outlander/EVO 3+ Series with the center
diff/viscous coupler (W5M33 and W5M40 series transmissions and variants).
Front / Rear diff ratios are (almost) the same. Torque can vary somewhat
automatically F<-->R. In extreme situations the center viscous coupler locks
and you get back to 50-50.
-Audi Quatro uses an automaticlly controlled center diff that can be
progressively locked. Competition versions use (AFAIK) a Torsen diff.
- Subaru. Depending on one of at least three types of AWD (std, automatic
and WRX-std). The most capable is the WRX type with a Torsen center diff,
the less capable is the hydro clutch system in cars with the automatic
transmission.
--
Stewart DIBBS
www.pixcl.com/lancerproject.htm